Welcome to Game Mode!
Select your challenge level:
Type missing words.
Enter to skip. Backspace to replay.
Astronomer Royal for Scotland, Catherine Haymans, has spent decades refining her dark matter map, reiterating the unsettling truth that we don’t understand 95% of our universe. The cosmos is composed of dark matter, dark energy, and ordinary matter and could actually be much younger than we think.
Select your challenge level:
Type missing words.
Enter to skip. Backspace to replay.
Your score is:
Scotland’s Astronomer Royal Catherine Haymans believes observations of the universe don’t agree on its age, because the mathematical models aren’t quite right. She suspects our understanding of the dark universe may be an illusion.
Right, our best information about the universe tells us what the universe looked like right after the Big Bang. And from that data, we can come up with a model of what the universe should look like today.
But what we’re finding is that the universe that we observe isn’t quite what we expected. And (that) we can’t fully explain the universe that we’re observing today, means that we can’t trust it when it tells us how old our universe is. Just doesn’t add up.
Katherine thinks that although researchers have calculated how much of the dark universe is out there, they have little real idea of its impact.
We know that the stuff we’re made up of the earth, the moon, the sun, everything we can see in the universe, that accounts for less than 5% of it. The rest is dark. Two components, dark matter and dark energy.
Dark matter. That’s the kind of the big gravitational stuff that keeps everything bound in our universe together. And then its evil twin, dark energy, which appears to be causing the expansion of our universe to accelerate. Those are our three main ingredients, and we only understand 5% of it. So, you could picture this as an epic fail for science. We don’t understand 95% of our universe. But I like to think of this as a big challenge, because if we can understand that, then hopefully that will really revolutionise our understanding of everything around us.
To try and work out just how dark matter impacts the universe, Katherine investigates how it has evolved over time since the Big Bang.
So, this is a map of dark matter, spanning across the sky. Where you can see bright spots, that’s where there’s lots and lots of dark matter. And as the colour gets darker, that’s where there’s emptier voids, where there’s much less dark matter in our universe. And what we’re finding is not what we were expecting. We can see clumps, we can see voids, we can see that cosmic web-like structure. But it’s not exactly what we expected. It’s a lot smoother than predicted for what we should see today. That´s a bit of a problem … because it takes time for these dark matter structures to form.
Katherine has spent decades fine-tuning and finessing a dark matter map.
So, for about the last 20 years, I’ve been working to map out the invisible dark matter in our universe. This is our map of the north, we’ve got another map of the south. And whilst this is one of the largest dark matter maps that we’ve ever been able to make, it’s still quite a small patch of the sky. So, we might have been unlucky. This might have been just a weird patch of the universe that we’ve looked at, but it’s not exactly what we expected. And the fact that this is a lot smoother suggests that the universe is slightly younger than we first thought.
As yet, Katherine is unsure just how much younger, but her work continues.
In this text, there are a few examples of past modals of deduction. We use different modal verbs (+ main verb) to indicate how sure we are about something: must (certain about something), might/ may/ could (possible, but not certain), can’t/ couldn’t (certain that something didn’t happen, not possible).
To make a deduction about the past using a modal verb, use the form: modal verb + have + past participle
Examples in the text:
© 2024 All rights reserved
Please Log In to use this feature.
Please log in to create a lesson plan.